Answer :
Answer:
The answer is: NO OPTION IS COMPLETE
Explanation:
Option A is totally wrong (the product should have been defective), but options B through F are incomplete.
They should have been:
B) The defendant must normally be engaged in the business of selling (or otherwise distributing) that product.
C) The product must be unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer because of its defective condition (in most states).
D) The plaintiff must incur physical harm to self or property by use or consumption of the product.
E) The defective condition must be the proximate cause of the injury or damage.
F) The goods must not have been substantially changed from the time the product was sold to the time the injury was sustained.