Answered

​James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc. Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied every using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Radical Boards: a. cannot be held liable to the teen and her mother because it did engage in the conduct. b. could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise. c. is no longer liable because it terminated Keller. d. has not committed any tort because watching customers in dressing rooms in part of a merchant's right. e. none of the above

Answer :

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise.

Explanation:

Companies must find different ways to supervise employees constantly. By doing this, firms make employees their follow policy and they are doing the job they were hired for. Supervising can be also used as a gauge so organizations find out if employees are covering the expectations of their performances.

Thus, inf front of Court, Radical Boards, Inc., is likely to be found liable for not supervising James Keller regularly and avoid him seeing the company's clients through dressing room peepholes.

Other Questions