Answer :
Answer:
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
Explanation:https://brainly.com/profile/wiseowl2018-13535824
this is not my answer
David Morris Potter was an American historian of the South who lived from December 6, 1910, in Augusta, Georgia, to February 18, 1971. Potter's book The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 (1976), an in-depth history and analysis of the causes of the American Civil War, earned the Pulitzer Prize for History posthumously in 1977.
Joseph Holt was an American lawyer, soldier, and politician who lived from January 6, 1807 to August 1, 1894.
The answers to the above questions are:
a) One significant disagreement between David M. Potter's and Michael F. Holt's historical readings of the Civil War is that Potter blamed the Civil War on the North and South's perennial sectional tensions. He said that it was ingrained sectionalism, not opposing views on the topic of slavery, that precipitated the Civil War.
Holt, on the other hand, stated that the Civil War was a break from the American history of compromise, and that it was not a typical occurrence in the American political democratic process.
b) This ONE particular historical event, the breakdown of the two-party system that put far-right democratic republicanism against center-right republicanism, can corroborate Potter's reading of the Civil War. White supremacy was advocated by far-right republicanism, whilst black equality was promoted by center-right democratic republicanism.
The Supreme Court's approval of Jim Crow legislation was warmly received by white nationalists, who enforced extreme segregation of whites and blacks. Separatism's principle and practice were to be overturned by the center-right moderates.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE particular historical event that demonstrated America's break with its culture of compromise. With all of the competing viewpoints from Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the Great Compromise of 1787 insured that America was not pushed into a civil war during the Constitution Convention.
As a result, Potter's explanation of the Civil War's cause focused on innate divisive tendencies between the North and the South, but Holt's blamed the collapse of the two-party system, which allowed democratic opposition.
For more information about David Morris Potter and Joseph Holt refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2800298