Is there statistically significant evidence that the districts with smaller classes have higher average test​ scores? The t​-statistic for testing the null hypothesis is nothing. ​(Round your response to two decimal places.​) The p​-value for the test is nothing. ​(Round your response to six decimal places.​)​ Hint: Use the Excel function Norm.S.Dist to help answer this question. Is there statistically significant evidence that the districts with smaller classes have higher average test​ scores? The ▼ small p-value large p-value suggests that the null hypothesis ▼ cannot be rejected can be rejected with a high degree of confidence.​ Hence, ▼ there is there is no statistically significant evidence that the districts with smaller classes have higher average test scores.

Answer :

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The  95% confidence interval is [tex] [670.03  , 673.97 ] [/tex]

The  test statistics is [tex]t = 7.7 [/tex]

The  p-value  is    [tex]p-value  =  0[/tex]

The p-value  suggests that the null hypothesis is rejected with a high degree of confidence. Hence  there is statistically significant evidence that the districts with smaller classes have higher average test score  

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size is  n =  408

    The sample mean is  [tex]\= y  =  672.0[/tex]

   The standard deviation is  [tex]s = 20.3[/tex]

Given that the confidence level  is 95% then the level of significance is  

   [tex]\alpha = (100 -95 )\% = 0.05[/tex]

From the normal distribution table  the critical value of [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{0.05 }{2}[/tex] is  

    [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } =  1.96[/tex]

Generally  the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

     [tex]E  =  Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \frac{s}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]E  =  1.96 *  \frac{20.3}{\sqrt{408} }[/tex]

=>     [tex]E  =  1.970[/tex]

Generally the 95% confidence interval is mathematically represented as

       [tex]\= y -E  < \mu <  \= y + E[/tex]

=>     [tex] 672.0 -1.970  < \mu < 672.0 +1.970[/tex]

=>     [tex] 670.03  < \mu < 673.97[/tex]

=>     [tex] [670.03  , 673.97 ] [/tex]

From the question we are told that

   Class size                                  small                                      large

  [tex]Avg.score(\= y)[/tex]         [tex]\= y_1 = 683.7[/tex]   [tex]\= y_2 =  676.0[/tex]

   [tex]S_y[/tex]                          [tex]S_{y_1} =20.2[/tex]    [tex]S_{y_2} = 18.6[/tex]

   sample size                             [tex]n_1 = 229[/tex]        [tex]n_2 =  184[/tex]

The  null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 > 0[/tex]

Generally the standard error for the difference in mean is mathematically represented as

       [tex]SE =  \sqrt{\frac{S_{y_1}^2 }{n_1} +\frac{S_{y_2}^2 }{n_2}   }[/tex]

=>     [tex]SE =  \sqrt{20.2^2 }{229} +\frac{18.6^2 }{184_2}   }[/tex]

=>     [tex]SE =  1.913[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

      [tex]t = \frac{\= y _1 - \= y_2 }{SE}[/tex]

=>    [tex]t = \frac{683.7 - 676.0 }{1.913}[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = 7.7 [/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

    [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  7.7 )[/tex]

From the  z-table

        [tex]P(t >  7.7 ) =  0[/tex]

So

   [tex]p-value  =  0[/tex]

From the values we obtained and calculated we can see that [tex]p-value  <  \alpha[/tex]

This mean that

The p-value  suggests that the null hypothesis is rejected with a high degree of confidence. Hence  there is statistically significant evidence that the districts with smaller classes have higher average test score  

${teks-lihat-gambar} okpalawalter8