Answer :
The two cases were on area redestricting and gerrymandering. They are court rulings on districts.
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5–4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
Gomillion v. lightfoot
An act of the Alabama legislature re-drew the electoral district boundaries of Tuskegee, replacing what had been a region with a square shape with a twenty-eight sided figure. The effect of the new district was to exclude essentially all blacks from the city limits of Tuskegee and place them in a district where no whites lived.
Similarities
- They are both both on redistricting and gerrymandering
- They are both on racial separation
Differences
- While Shaw v. Reno calls for equal protection among races, Gomillion V. Lightfoot calls for segregation among blacks and whites
Therefore, similarities and differences are as stated above.
learn more about shaw v. reno and gomillion v. lightfoot from here: https://brainly.com/question/1278532