Answer :
Any more information?
This is not an arithmetic or geometric sequence. It has no constant velocity, acceleration, or even thrust. You COULD make a higher order function fit each data point, however until you can actually find a constant rate of change at the higher orders it is not certain in any way that that function would predict the next term...
dy/dx=-5, -2, 7, 1, -4, -1
d2y/dx2=3, 9, -6, -5, 3
d3y/dx3=6, -15, 1, 8
d4y/dx4=-21, 16, 7
d5y/dx5=37, -9
d6y/dx6=-46 *note that the data never showed a constant rate of change
From above it can be seen that we COULD create a function to fit all of the points, but there would be no certainty in any way that that function would accurately predict the next number in the sequence.
ax^6+bx^5+cx^4+dx^3+ex^2+fx+g=y
And that would be a tedious amount of work to create that matrix to find a function that is essentially useless in predicting the next number in the sequence with any certainty...
This is not an arithmetic or geometric sequence. It has no constant velocity, acceleration, or even thrust. You COULD make a higher order function fit each data point, however until you can actually find a constant rate of change at the higher orders it is not certain in any way that that function would predict the next term...
dy/dx=-5, -2, 7, 1, -4, -1
d2y/dx2=3, 9, -6, -5, 3
d3y/dx3=6, -15, 1, 8
d4y/dx4=-21, 16, 7
d5y/dx5=37, -9
d6y/dx6=-46 *note that the data never showed a constant rate of change
From above it can be seen that we COULD create a function to fit all of the points, but there would be no certainty in any way that that function would accurately predict the next number in the sequence.
ax^6+bx^5+cx^4+dx^3+ex^2+fx+g=y
And that would be a tedious amount of work to create that matrix to find a function that is essentially useless in predicting the next number in the sequence with any certainty...